The Structural Funds finance multi-annual programmes which constitute development strategies drawn up in a partnership associating the regions, the Member States and the European Commission taking into account guidelines laid down by the Commission which apply throughout the Union. They act on economic and social structures to:
Development initiatives financed by the Structural Funds must meet the specific needs identified on the ground by regions or Member States. They form part of an approach to development which respects the environment and promotes equal opportunities. Implementation is decentralised, which means that it is mainly the responsibility of the national and regional authorities.
The four Structural Funds do not constitute a single source of finance within the Union budget. Each has its own specific thematic area although all work hand in hand.
The Structural Funds do not finance separate individual projects but multiannual regional development programmes drawn up together by the regions, the Member States and the Commission. They take into account the guidelines proposed by the Commission for the Union as a whole.
A special solidarity Fund, the Cohesion Fund, was set up in 1993 to help the four least prosperous Member States: Greece, Portugal, Ireland and Spain. It provides assistance throughout these countries to finance major projects in the fields of the environment and transport. For the period from 2000 to 2006, the annual budget of the Cohesion Fund will amount to ~2.5 billion, or ~18 billion over seven years.
To enhance its impact and secure the best possible results, 94% of structural funding is concentrated on three objectives defined as priorities:
Objective 1 (territorial)
Helping regions whose development is lagging behind to catch up, i.e. providing them with the basic infrastructure which they continue to lack or encourage investments in business economic activity.Some fifty regions, home to 22% of the Union's population, are concerned and they receive 70% of the funding available.
Objective 2 (territorial)
Supporting economic and social conversion in industrial, rural, urban or fisheries-dependent areas facing structural difficulties. 18% of the Union's population lives in these crisis-hit areas, which receive 11.5% of total funding.
The Union has also devised four special programmes, known as Community Initiatives, to find common solutions to problems affecting the whole Union.
These four programmes absorb 5.35% of the budget of the Structural Funds. Each Initiative is financed by only one Fund.
Interreg III
promotes cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation, i.e. the creation of partnerships across borders to encourage the balanced development of multi-regional areas (financed by the ERDF).
Urban II
concentrates its support on innovative strategies to regenerate cities and declining urban areas (financed by the ERDF).
Leader+
aims to bring together those active in rural societies and economies to look at new local strategies for sustainable development (financed by the EAGGF Guidance Section).
Equal
seeks to eliminate the factors leading to inequalities and discrimination in the labour market (financed by the ESF).
To improve the quality of regional development strategies the Commission intends to support the latest ideas which have not yet been adequately exploited. They are expected to provide the regions with the scope for experimentation which they sometimes lack but need to meet the challenges of the information society and to make their economies more competitive.
The Commission has laid down three working topics for ERDF innovative actions in 2000-2006:
Other innovative actions are also planned for employment and training (financed by the ESF), and in the fisheries sector (financed by the FIFG).
With a budget of about ~1 billion, representing 0.5% of the budget of the Structural Funds, the innovative actions programmes finance the drawing-up of new strategies and the experimental phase of projects. If the initial stage proves satisfactory, projects may then be included in the strategies under the different Objectives.
Table 1.
Structural Assistance 2000-2006 |
213 billion |
Structural Funds |
195,00 billion |
Priority Objectives |
182,45 billion |
Objective 1 |
135,90 billion |
Objective 2213 |
22,50 billion |
Objective 3 |
24,05 billion |
Community Initiatives |
10,44 billion |
Fisheries |
1,11 billion |
Innovative actions |
1,00 billion |
Cohesion Fund |
18 billion |
Amounts in euro |
Table 2.
Funds concerned |
Objective 1 |
Objective 2 |
Objective 3 |
ERDF |
ERDF |
ESF |
|
ESF |
ESF |
||
EAGGF-Guidance |
|||
FIFG |
Table 3.
The Structural Funds do not directly allocated to projects chosen by the Commission. While the main priorities of a development programme are defined in co-operation with the Commission, the choice of projects and their management are solely the responsibility of the national and regional authorities. This greater decentralisation is one of the main innovations in this new programming period.
Once projects have been selected, they are financed from both national and Community funds, since programme budgets are always comprised of Union funds as well as national sources (public or private).
Union funding is always added to national funding so that the country may overcome the limits imposed by its own financial capacity.
However, Community funding is not provided as a means for countries to make savings in their own national budgets.
The Member States bear the main responsibility for the development of areas in difficulty. The Union helps them achieve more and obtain better results than they could acting on their own. That is the real added value of the Structural Funds.
Unlike the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund and ISPA do not co-finance programmes but projects or stages of projects which are clearly identified from the start. These projects are submitted to the Commission by the Member States, managed by the national authorities and supervised by a Monitoring Committee.
Source: http://europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/intro/regions1_en.htm